Based on an analysis of 783 X \/ Twitter posts trending in Iraq on November 12, 2025, Miqrab AI identified several key narratives surrounding the country’s parliamentary elections. The discourse was dominated by reactions to the preliminary election results, with supporters of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ Al Sudani’s coalition celebrating their apparent victory. A significant counter-narrative emerged from the Sadrist movement, which boycotted the election; its leader, Muqtada al-Sadr, criticized religious authorities for encouraging participation and thanked those who abstained from voting. Concurrently, many accounts expressed deep skepticism about the electoral process, questioning official turnout figures and alleging irregularities. Other prominent themes included the circulation of lists detailing prominent candidates who lost their seats, sectarian framing of the results in key areas like Baghdad, and praise for the professionalism of the Iraqi security forces who secured the polling stations.<\/p>\n
The most impactful story centered on the Sadrist movement’s reaction to the parliamentary elections, which it officially boycotted. The influential account Wazir al-Qaid – Salih Muhammad al-Iraqi<\/a> (Post Impact: 100%)<\/strong>, which is widely seen as a mouthpiece for Muqtada al-Sadr, posted a statement from the cleric criticizing Sheikh Abdul Mahdi al-Karbalai, the representative of the supreme religious authority (Marja’iyya). Al-Sadr expressed disappointment that the Sheikh encouraged participation, stating that doing so failed to “save Iraq from the claws of the corrupt.” The same account also posted a simple but powerful message: “To the boycotters… Thank you”<\/em> (Wazir al-Qaid – Salih Muhammad al-Iraqi<\/a>, (Post Impact: 76%)<\/strong>). This sentiment was echoed by others, such as Faeq Al Sheikh Ali\/My Word for History<\/a> (Post Impact: 37%)<\/strong>, who saluted the boycotters as heroes and told them not to be concerned with “the winners dividing the spoils and power.”<\/em> The criticism of the Marja’iyya’s representative drew commentary from accounts like Ahmad Abd Al-Sada<\/a> (Post Impact: 7%)<\/strong>, who accused Sadr of narcissism for objecting to the Marja’iyya’s rational and patriotic discourse that prioritizes the public interest.<\/p>\n Supporters and official accounts celebrated the strong performance of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ Al Sudani’s “Reconstruction and Development” coalition. Al Sudani himself posted on his official account, Mohammed Shia’ Al Sudani<\/a> (Post Impact: 40%)<\/strong>, thanking the Iraqi people for their support and declaring, “Our ‘Reconstruction and Development’ coalition is first, because we believe that ‘Iraq is first’.”<\/em> Numerous accounts shared unofficial results that placed Al Sudani’s coalition ahead, particularly in Baghdad. Shaho Al-Qaradaghi<\/a> (Post Impact: 9%)<\/strong> and Ali al-Khalidi – Ali al-Khalidi<\/a> (Post Impact: 12%)<\/strong> both reported that Al Sudani was “number one in Baghdad,” followed by Mohammed al-Halbousi’s Taqadum party and Nouri al-Maliki’s State of Law coalition. This shift was highlighted by Hayder<\/a> (Post Impact: 7%)<\/strong>, who noted that Nouri al-Maliki had lost the title of “number one in Baghdad” for the first time in many years.<\/p>\n A significant portion of the online conversation was marked by deep distrust in the integrity of the elections. Commentator Ali Fadhil _ Ali Fadhil<\/a> (Post Impact: 15%)<\/strong> pointed out a suspicious surge in voting numbers, noting that while 4 million people voted between 7 AM and 3 PM, an additional 12 million allegedly voted in the final three hours before polls closed at 6 PM. He sarcastically commented, “How and why? Nobody knows,”<\/em> adding the hashtag #VeryFair. Similarly, Ahmad Alwishah<\/a> (Post Impact: 11%)<\/strong> presented his own analysis, arguing that the true participation rate was only 20% of the 29 million eligible voters, far below the official figures, once forced voting among security forces and incentivized party monitors are accounted for. Faeq Al Sheikh Ali\/My Word for History<\/a> (Post Impact: 28%)<\/strong> also expressed doubt, quipping, “Oh commission… let’s not make us call it the ’56 original’ election!”<\/em>, a reference likely understood by his followers to imply fraud.<\/p>\n The preliminary results, particularly from Baghdad, sparked a wave of sectarian commentary. User Wasan Al-Shaikhli<\/a> (Post Impact: 49%)<\/strong> posted a video stating she would “celebrate the Shi’a victory tonight”<\/em> in her own way. Other accounts focused on the electoral math, with Wesam Aziz<\/a> (Post Impact: 15%)<\/strong> providing vote counts for Shi’a versus Sunni blocs in Baghdad and concluding, “Baghdad is Shi’a.”<\/em> This sentiment was echoed by Emad Al Musafir<\/a> (Post Impact: 10%)<\/strong>, who stated that the “Shi’a majority in Baghdad won 47 out of 69 seats.”<\/em> Issam Hussein<\/a> (Post Impact: 7%)<\/strong> argued in a lengthy post that the numerical superiority of Shi’a voters is an unchangeable reality and that Sunni parties must accept their actual electoral size rather than rely on “rosy dreams.”<\/p>\n As preliminary results trickled in, a major trend was the compilation and sharing of lists detailing prominent candidates and incumbent MPs who failed to secure a seat. Yasser Eljuboori – Yasser Al-Jubouri<\/a> (Post Impact: 16%)<\/strong> posted a comprehensive list of “the most prominent losers,” including incumbent MP Sajjad Salem, former general Nasser al-Ghannam, journalist Ali Adhab, and Sarah Ayad Allawi. This list was reposted by others, including Hiba Alnnaayib HIBA Alnnayib<\/a> (Post Impact: 7%)<\/strong>. Other accounts like Mazin Al-Eshaiker<\/a> (Post Impact: 9%)<\/strong> and Hayder<\/a> (Post Impact: 8%)<\/strong> shared their own versions of these lists, confirming a widespread interest in the political figures who were not re-elected.<\/p>\n Amid the political turmoil, several posts highlighted the positive role of the Iraqi security forces during the election process. Rusly Al-Maliki<\/a> (Post Impact: 24%)<\/strong> shared a widely praised video of armed forces members who had used a dilapidated school as a polling station. Before leaving, they renovated and painted the school at their own expense, leaving a message for the students: “Your army was here \u2764\ufe0f\ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf6!”<\/em> This positive portrayal was reinforced by a post from Hayder<\/a> (Post Impact: 6%)<\/strong>, which showed images of security forces cleaning schools and returning them to the Ministry of Education after their election duties were completed, emphasizing their responsible conduct.<\/p>\n Several influential commentators expressed pessimism and cynicism about what the election results would mean for Iraq’s future. Faeq Al Sheikh Ali\/My Word for History<\/a> (Post Impact: 22%)<\/strong> predicted that nothing would change, stating that “electronic armies will return to insulting and accusing honorable people of treason”<\/em> and that voters who supported militias will soon resume complaining about poor conditions. In a similarly bleak assessment, Aayad Al Twfan – Aayad Al Twfan<\/a> (Post Impact: 13%)<\/strong> sarcastically congratulated the country on the “victory of sectarianism, tribalism, political money, and corruption,”<\/em> and apologized to future generations because “we did not create a homeland for them.”<\/em><\/p>\n The Al-Sadiqoun movement, the political wing of the Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq militia, emerged as another major winner in the election, with multiple posts highlighting its growing power. Hayder<\/a> (Post Impact: 21%)<\/strong> tracked the movement’s electoral progress, noting its growth from one seat in 2014 to a projected 28 seats in 2025. This success was analyzed by Ali Wajeeh<\/a> (Post Impact: 7%)<\/strong>, who called Al-Sadiqoun a “success story in local politics”<\/em> and praised its leader for knowing when to be a politician, a radical, or calm, describing it as the essence of politics. Supporters also began making demands, with one account, Dr. Hussein Al-Safi<\/a> (Post Impact: 7%)<\/strong>, calling for Al-Sadiqoun to take control of the Ministry of Education to combat corruption.<\/p>\n Following the announcement of preliminary results, several candidates took to X to address their supporters. Sajjad Salem<\/a> (Post Impact: 31%)<\/strong>, an independent MP associated with the Tishreen protest movement, formally conceded his loss. He stated that he carried the banner of the revolution politically as much as he could and refused to compromise its principles “in the face of the temptation of money or the intimidation of weapons.”<\/em> He vowed to remain in Iraq and continue his opposition to the ruling parties. Similarly, Qusay Mahbouba<\/a> (Post Impact: 12%)<\/strong> also acknowledged his defeat but thanked his voters and congratulated Prime Minister Al Sudani, stating that a “personal loss in a victorious project does not delay the march towards the ultimate goal.”<\/em><\/p>\n Specific controversies involving individual candidates also trended. The account _. suhair Al_jumaili<\/a> (Post Impact: 13%)<\/strong> shared a video of “Abu Turab al-Tamimi,” a candidate from the Badr Organization, complaining that he lost only because his opponent, the governor of Basra, had more power and resources. Another debate centered on candidate Amir al-Mousawi’s dual Iranian-Iraqi citizenship. Najah Mohammed Ali<\/a> (Post Impact: 12%)<\/strong> defended al-Mousawi, calling the criticism hypocritical. He argued that numerous high-level Iraqi officials, including past and present presidents and prime ministers, hold dual citizenship with Western countries without facing similar outrage, suggesting the attacks stem from an “Iran complex” rather than genuine nationalist concern.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Based on an analysis of 783 X \/ Twitter posts trending in Iraq on November 12, 2025, Miqrab AI identified several key narratives surrounding the country’s parliamentary elections. The discourse was dominated by reactions to the preliminary election results, with supporters of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia’ Al Sudani’s coalition celebrating their apparent victory. A significant […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":7577,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[72,73,78],"tags":[82,52,81,83],"class_list":["post-7576","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-twitter-x","category-iraq","category-daily","tag-daily-reports","tag-iraq-daily-social-media-trends","tag-iraq-public-opinion","tag-trending-x-twitter"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/miqrab.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7576","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/miqrab.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/miqrab.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miqrab.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miqrab.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7576"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/miqrab.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7576\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7578,"href":"https:\/\/miqrab.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7576\/revisions\/7578"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miqrab.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7577"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/miqrab.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miqrab.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/miqrab.ai\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}2. Prime Minister Al Sudani’s Coalition Claims Victory in Preliminary Election Results<\/h2>\n
3. Skepticism and Allegations of Irregularities Surround Electoral Process and Turnout<\/h2>\n
4. Sectarian Discourse Emerges in Reaction to Baghdad Election Results<\/h2>\n
5. Lists of Prominent Political Losers Circulate Widely Online<\/h2>\n
6. Iraqi Security Forces Praised for Professionalism and Community Engagement<\/h2>\n
7. Commentators Offer Cynical Predictions for Iraq’s Post-Election Future<\/h2>\n
8. Al-Sadiqoun Movement Celebrates Significant Gains in Parliamentary Seats<\/h2>\n
9. Candidates Publicly Concede Defeat and Vow to Continue Their Work<\/h2>\n
10. Controversies Emerge Over Candidate Complaints and Dual Nationality<\/h2>\n